Showing posts with label Referendum 71. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Referendum 71. Show all posts

Sunday, November 8, 2009

LGBT History Is Made With Washington Voters Approving Referendum 71

UPDATE: Washington's Secretary of State blog says Referendum 71 goes into effect 12-3-09, essentially calling a victory.

Washington state voters have ushered in a new moment in LGBT history by approving the state's new "everything but marriage" domestic partnership law.

With 69% of the expected vote counted Thursday, Referendum 71 lead 52% to 48%, roughly the numbers of the votes in Maine, but there, residents voted against marriage equality. This is great news for LGBT rights after that crushing blow.

"This moment in history is simply unprecedented," says Joe Mirabella on Seattle PI. Joe worked tirelessly with many bloggers, including Lurleen at Pam's House Blend, as part of the netroots team for the Approve Referendum 71 campaign.

"Referendum 71 was only the 6th referendum in Washington history to ever be approved by Washington voters. It is far easier to reject a referendum than approve one. In only 6 weeks we changed the conversation from the decline to sign campaign, to one of approve," Joe continued. "We faced an off year election, when older more conservative voters have a far better voting record. An LGBT referendum has never been approved by voters anywhere in the United States, that is until November 3 when fair minded voters from throughout the state said, "yes we want equality for all Washington families."

National gay-rights groups concur, saying the passage of Referendum 71 marks the first time a state's voters have approved a gay equality measure at the ballot box.

"This victory promotes fairness, supports families, and is good for Washington state and the country. This victory sends the message that no family should be left vulnerable and without basic protections because of someone else's prejudices," said Rea Carey, Executive Director of the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force.

"This is a wonderful victory for all those who value fairness and equality," said Josh Friedes, Approve Referendum 71 campaign manager. "Washingtonians have defended fairness and taken a strong stand for all families. We would not be celebrating this victory if it were not for Washingtonians' commitment to civil rights, our amazing campaign staff, our volunteers, our community and allies, and the support of organizations like the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force. The Task Force spent time with us on the ground to train our campaign field team and contributed financially to help us ensure this victory."

Lurleen remarked on the voter map posted to the left, pointing out how much has changed in Washington in such a short amount of time.

"The last time Washington voters had the opportunity to ratify a pro-equality law at the polls was in 1997. Initiative to the People 677 proposed an employment non-discrimination law," Lurleen said. "The ballot title read Shall discrimination based on sexual orientation be prohibited in employment, employment agency, and union membership practices, without requiring employee partner benefits or preferential treatment?

"The measure was rejected 59.7% to 40.3%," she continues. "Contrary to the current image of the Puget Sound area of Washington as progressive, not one single county - not even Seattle's home of King County - voted to approve I-677. Contrast that with the current election where the electorate as a whole approved R-71 and majorities in 10 of Washington's 39 counties have approved R-71. But the truly stunning statistic is that the rate of ballot measure approval increased between 1997 and 2009 in all but one county."

This should make anti-LGBT forces quake in their boots. After their victory in Maine, they have continually declared that the tide is in fact not turning against them but in fact moving with them. Sounds like they spoke a little too soon.

THANK YOU, WASHINGTON! YOUR SUPPORT WILL GO DOWN IN HISTORY!

Wednesday, November 4, 2009

Washington State Close to Passing Inclusive Domestic Partnerships Bill

UPDATE: Reject 71 campaign is hiding from the media and have said of the new domestic partnership law, "We've got to get rid of the cobra before it gets out of the cage."

In Washington state voters decided whether or not to Approve or Reject Referendum 71, which would be an approval or rejection of the state's "everything but marriage" domestic partnership law. For the first time, the state did an all mail-in vote and any ballots post marked with yesterday's date will be counted. So they're still trickling in.

Right now, the tally is 51.03% for approval to 48.98% for rejection.

The Approve Referendum 71 issued the following statement:

Voters affirming domestic partnerships for gay and lesbian families

For Immediate Release - Nov. 3, 2009

Washington may be first state in nation to support domestic partnership by popular vote

SEATTLE - Washington voters today appear to be approving Referendum 71, upholding a state law that provides important legal protections for gays and lesbians and seniors in registered domestic partnerships.

Nearly all of the state's voters now vote by mail and ballots only need to be postmarked by Election Day, not counted by Election Day, so many ballots won't actually be counted until Wednesday or Thursday. In King County, where 'Approve' is winning by a two-to-one margin, fewer than half the ballots have been counted, and the campaign estimates that the ballots that remain to be counted in King County will account for over 30 percent of the votes remaining to be counted statewide.

"Based on the results we saw tonight, we will be making history in moving forward toward full equality for gay and lesbian Washingtonians and their families," said Anne Levinson, Chair of the Approve 71 campaign. "Voters across the state listened to the personal stories of gay and lesbian families, and the challenges they face, and, based on the returns so far, they are sending a resounding message - we want to see all families treated equally under the law."

"We believe the end result of this election will be a win not just for the couples and families, but for all Washingtonians who believe in values of fairness and equality," Levinson continued. "It was profoundly wrong for some to try to eliminate the rights of others."

"We are all harmed when any of us is treated differently under the law. We hope this puts an end to the divisive and mean spirited attacks by extremist groups against gay and lesbian Washingtonians and that we can all work together on the real problems confronting all families - gay and non-gay alike."

The Approve 71 campaign was supported by a broad statewide coalition and received more than 500 endorsements, including faith-based groups and organizations representing communities of color, seniors, education, health care and public safety; clergy of many denominations; labor; large employers such as Microsoft, Google, Starbucks, Boeing; small businesses; civic groups, organizations that care for families, immigrant populations and children, who all took a stand in support of their friends, neighbors and co-workers.

"This was one of the shortest statewide ballot campaigns in Washington. We had only weeks between certification and the first ballots going out. If these trends continue, this will be only the sixth referendum approved in the history of our state," said Josh Friedes, Approve 71 Campaign Manager. "To have these kinds of numbers in an off-year election where those who vote tend to be older and more conservative is a real testament to the broad support for Washington's gay and lesbian families."

Friedes and Levinson both noted that because of Referendum 71 - which Protect Marriage Washington, the Family Policy Institute, the National Organization for Marriage and others fought to force on the ballot -Washingtonians now have a greater understanding of the challenges faced by gay and lesbian families and the legal protections they lacked.

"Were it not for the referendum, the law would have just quietly gone into effect in July. By forcing the referendum, those groups have likely done quite a lot to advance the cause of full equality for lesbian and gay families in Washington state," Levinson said.

Friday, October 30, 2009

Approve Referendum 71 FINAL Weekend Actions

Crossposted with Lurleen at Pam's House Blend.

There are only a few days left to vote APPROVE on Referendum 71. If you haven't already, please mark your ballot "approved" on R-71 and mail it in now (but no later than November 3rd). Don't procrastinate! In 2008 over 8,000 ballots in King County alone were not counted because they were postmarked too late! The Approve 71 campaign manager says
This race is still too close for comfort. As we've said from the beginning, this election will be decided by voter turnout. Money is pouring in from out of state to fund our opponents, and they are investing heavily in radio ads. We know the best way to counteract the outrageous lies our opponents are telling is with direct conversations with voters.

You can help us win by phone banking any night of the week between now and the election, canvassing at our Trick or Vote event, and waving signs at intersections to raise visibility for the Approve 71 campaign. It is essential that we each do all we can to get out the vote. Our state-of-the-art system is set up to only call voters who have not voted yet.

  • To register to phone bank in Seattle, RSVP here
  • To register for Trick or Vote, RSVP here
  • For a schedule of sign waving events you can register for, click here

    Here is a link to a schedule of phone banks, canvassing and Approve 71 sign waving events going on in the Seattle area.

    Thank you for all you have done to help ensure gay and lesbian families are treated equally under state law.

    P.S. If you have not already joined our Facebook group, join us! Our fan base is growing by more than 100 people per hour! Join us!


  • Folks, be sure to print out and fill your pockets with plenty of palm cards to give to people. This is a great reminder for people when they get home and start wondering, "now what was that all about, and how can I get more information?"

    Make sure your signs are clearly marked "Approve Referendum 71" besides whatever other messages you wish to write.

    Bellevue sponsored by Bellevue PFLAG
    Saturday, October 31
    1 pm - 3 pm

    At NE 8th and 112th. That big intersection at 405 and NE 8th Street.

    Bring signs with simple statements that drivers can read...Approve Ref 71, Protect All Washington Families, or personal messages. Keep them simple and positive. Even stop by for 30 minutes but be involved...Dress for cold/rain but bring your smiles and be ready to wave!!!

    Seattle - RSVP here
    Friday, October 30
    7:00 am - 8:00 am
    4:30 pm - 5:30 pm

    Join us at the Madison I-5 overpass between Downtown and Capitol Hill to show our support for APPROVING referendum 71 to the morning commuters.

    Millions of Washingtonians drive onto the I-5 weekly and this is our chance to make sure they vote to APPROVE referendum 71.

    We will be waving signs and showing our support.

    Seattle - RSVP here
    Monday, November 2
    Tuesday, November 3
    7:00 am - 8:00 am

    Join us at the Madison I-5 overpass between Downtown and Capitol Hill to show our support for APPROVING referendum 71 to the morning commuters.

    Millions of Washingtonians drive onto the I-5 weekly and this is our chance to make sure they vote to APPROVE referendum 71.

    We will be waving signs and showing our support.

    Tacoma
    Saturday, October 31
    11:00 am - 4:00 pm

    Kelly McDonald:
    Where: Corner of South 38th & South Steele, Tacoma (Costco & Borders)

    There is one more weekend before the election.

    We need YOU this Saturday. The opposition has incredible numbers, and Tacomans must see both sides represented.

    If you have an hour or two to give this Saturday, please stop by.

    Bring signs and wear green!

    Important details:
    1) Parking is an issue. It's best to find street parking by the Toyota dealership or in the residential area behind Costco.
    2) Enhance our visibility by wearing green
    3) Bring signs with you
    4) Are you staying a while? Bring a water bottle and a snack (there goes the mom in me!) :)
    5) If you cannot make it, invite someone to come on your behalf!

    The Rejects WILL be there, per communication made to area businesses from their side. Though tempting, it is NOT effective to engage with them. They will try. We are there to be visible to the public in a peaceful, positive, affirming way.

    Looking forward to seeing you there, en masse, and so excited at the amazing effect of Facebook word of mouth!

    Kelly

    Tacoma
    Tuesday, November 3rd
    6 am - 9 am
    4 pm - 6 pm

    Kelly McDonald: Election Day is the final opportunity to generate visibility! We need YOU to sign wave at the Jackson Avenue overpass over Highway 16.

    Woodinville sponsored by Bellevue PFLAG
    Saturday, October 31st
    10 am - 11:30 am

    Corner of NE 175th Street and 131st Ave NE right past the railroad underpass in downtown Woodinville (near McLendon's)
    Parking is nearby on side streets and there is a small park trail on 131st Ave NE.

    Bring signs with simple statements that drivers can read...Approve Ref 71, Protect All Washington Families, or personal messages. Keep them simple and positive. Even stop by for 30 minutes but be involved...Dress for cold/rain but bring your smiles and be ready to wave!!!

    Thursday, October 29, 2009

    VIDEO: Approve Referendum 71 Debates Knights of Columbus

    On Sunday PBS KCTS 9 in Washington state broadcast a debate on Referendum 71 which is asking residents to Approve or Reject the new "everything but marriage" domestic partnership law.

    Chair of Washington Families Standing Together Anne Levinson debates Bob Struble form Knights of Columbus

    Wednesday, October 28, 2009

    Court Victory for Approve Referendum 71; Google Endorses Campaign

    Opponents of the new "everything but marriage" domestic partnership law in Washington state went to court to fight the donor limit law that restricted funding for their Reject Referendum 71 campaign. They requested an emergency lift on the law.

    They didn't get the response they wanted. The Seattle Times reports:
    A federal judge has denied emergency requests from a group called Washington Family PAC, which wanted to suspend a ban on large campaign contributions and a requirement to identify donors.

    The brand-new political action committee said that the laws were blocking its ability to collect last-minute political contributions in the week before Washington's general election.

    A full hearing on the case has not been set.

    In other Referendum 71 news, Google has decided to speak up in favor of the Approve 71 campaign which seeks to APPROVE the new domestic partnership law. They sent a letter to the editor of Seattle PI voicing their support.
    To the Editor:

    Google has a reputation for actively participating in policy debates surrounding information access, technology and energy. However, we do not generally take positions on social, legal or political issues that arise beyond our normal, day-to-day business. With that said, there are issues that are so important and so clear cut that we feel compelled to lend our voice. Supporting Referendum 71 is one of those issues.

    To be clear, we respect the strongly-held beliefs that people have on both sides of this argument. Nevertheless, we see this debate as one that comes down to equality, plain and simple. If we believe in equal protection under the law we must, in our view, support a man or woman's right to enjoy the legal benefits of domestic partnerships -- no matter who they love.

    For the residents of Washington who want for themselves or their children the right to engage in domestic partnerships, we urge the voters of this state to APPROVE Referendum 71.

    Brian Bershad - Engineering and Site Director, Google Seattle

    Scott Silver - Engineering and Site Director, Google Kirkland
    Get involved! Go to Approve Referendum 71 and protect LGBT rights!

    Tuesday, October 27, 2009

    New Poll Shows Approve Referendum 71 Pulling Ahead

    UPDATE 6:00pm PST: An even newer poll just released by SurveyUSA of 561 likely and actual voters showed indicate that 50% would approve Referendum 71 and 43% would reject with 7% still undecided.

    A new poll of 500 likely voters from Approve Referendum 71, the campaign that is asking Washington state residents to approve the new "everything but marriage" domestic partnership law, shows they hold a slight lead with 53% and opponents losing support at 36%.

    The Approve 71 campaign celebrated the news but cautioned against complacency. Anne Levinson, chairwoman of the campaign, said in a press release, "This is both good--and cautionary--news. These results show that when voters understand what the domestic partnership law is--and the many families who will be harmed if it is repealed--they will vote to approve it.

    "Yet, we also know that in an off-year election, older, more conservative voters turn out in greater numbers. While there is broad statewide support for treating all families equally, those who vote will determine the outcome of this election," Levinson continued. "This poll makes a very clear point: those who want to ensure that legal protections aren't taken away from gay and lesbian families absolutely have to vote."

    Approve 71 campaign manager Josh Friedes noted that only a small percentage of voters have turned in their ballots so far.

    "What our poll shows us is that if supportive voters cast their ballots, we will win. That's why getting fair-minded voters to cast their ballots on time is so important—we're seeing ballots from less urban parts of the state being sent in, while voters in King, Pierce and Snohomish counties are not yet mailing their ballots in large numbers,” said Friedes.

    ”We are also reaching out to younger voters—who often don’t vote in offyear elections—to mail in their ballots," added Friedes. "Younger voters could make a big difference since they tend to be more supportive, and many are not included in the poll because they are not considered likely voters.

    "We need people to spend the five minutes to fill-out the ballot. And then we need them to actually put a stamp on the envelope—or two stamps if they live in Pierce County—and mail it.

    "Basic legal protections for thousands of committed couples hinge on this simple act," concluded Friedes. "Our message is 'Vote now!'"

    Help the Approve Referendum 71. Volunteer and help Get Out the Vote!

    ONLY 7 DAYS LEFT UNTIL ELECTIONS! We Can Win in Maine and Washington, But Only With Your Help!

    From the NO on 1/Protect Maine Equality campaign:
    We've got one week to Election Day. And what is the Yes campaign doing? Throwing everything but the kitchen sink at marriage equality.

    Change the subject. Divert voters. Mislead reporters. And never, never talk about fairness or equality for all loving couples and their families.

    Won't you help us cut through these lies and distortions? Will you help us speak directly to Maine voters and get our supporters to the polls to vote NO on 1?

    This election will come down to turnout. And we are counting on out-of-state volunteers -- people like you -- to make help us make the difference in an off-year election.

    You can help us preserve marriage equality in Maine and stave off a crushing defeat.

    If you have a phone and an internet connection, we need your help today. Please sign up now for a CALL FOR EQUALITY training/call shift today to make calls to Maine voters from home:

    Sign-up for a 6:30pm EST training/call shift tonight by clicking here.

    If you can't join us today, you can still call -- find another shift here.

    Voters are voting NOW -- by email and at early voting locations. That means we need a "virtual phonebank" to lob in calls to Maine voters who will make the difference between victory and defeat on election night.

    If you've never made phone calls to voters, it's easy. You'll almost always be talking with a Maine voter who supports marriage equality. We will personally train you over the phone before your shift, give you a script and all of the information you need to make these critical calls . . .

    This election could come down to a handful of voters. And, often, an extra nudge from a supporter like you is what motivates someone to vote. Please click here to sign up and get started making calls from home today.
    If you live here in California, find out how you can help by either joining up with Equality California or Vote For Equality.

    In Washington state, they're down to the wire. They can win this election! The biggest challenge facing the Approve Referendum 71 campaign is getting their support base out and into the ballot booths.

    Go here to find out where you can join up with a phone bank and urge supporters to make that vote! Polls show every vote will count. Make that difference!

    VIDEO: Stephen Colbert Squares Off With Referendum 71

    Stephen Colbert on last night's The Colbert Report takes on Washington state's Referendum 71.

    The Colbert ReportMon - Thurs 11:30pm / 10:30c
    The Word - Don't Ask Don't Tell
    www.colbertnation.com
    Colbert Report Full EpisodesPolitical HumorMichael Moore


    Colbert jokes that those who signed the petition to get Referendum 71 on the ballot belong to a minority of intolerance. He refers to the lawsuit that has reached the U.S. Supreme Court to keep those identities private.

    "Folks we need to protect this persecuted minority," Colbert quips. "And the only way I can see to do that is for Washington residents to vote in favor of gay domestic partnerships, because then no one will care who signed this petition, and these people can stay in the closet that the gay people have abandoned."

    Preach it.

    Get involved at APPROVE REFERENDUM 71.

    Sunday, October 25, 2009

    Californians - Help Maine and Washington State Protect Their Rights!

    For those of us here in California, we know what it's like to have our rights taken away. The campaign to pass Proposition 8 demoralized us with lies and attack ads, and the passage and the aftermath destroyed us. We even witnessed a rise in hate crimes against us.

    Though it galvanized us into creating a resurgence in the LGBT rights movement that hasn't been seen in years, the pain is enduring.

    And now Washington state and Maine face similar ballot measures that intend to take existing LGBT rights away.

    Californians - don't feel helpless. You can contribute to protecting those rights.

    Vote For Equality and Equality California have set up phone banks
    to help these states defeat the opposition by getting supporters out to the ballots. (Read VFE's blog post about working in Maine!)

    Maine Phone Banks - Sign Up Here!

    Sunday, Oct. 25 (10am-2pm) @ The Village
    Sunday, Nov. 1 (11am-3pm) @ The Village
    Monday, Nov. 2 (10:30am-1:30pm) @ The Village
    Monday, Nov. 2 (2:30pm-5:30pm) @ The Village

    Election Day:
    Tuesday, Nov. 3 (10:30am-1:30pm) @ The Village
    Tuesday, Nov. 3 (2:30pm-5:30pm) @ The Village

    Washington Phone Banks - Sign Up Here!

    EQCA will send you details when you sign up. Also, check out Unite the Fight's calendar at the bottom of the blog for dates and times as well.

    Saturday, October 24, 2009

    Ref. 71 RoundUp: Anti-LGBT Forces Want Special Rights; Audio of Opposition Robocall; Starbucks Speaks Up

    Opposition Wants Special Rights To Fight LGBT Rights

    The Daily News reports that the groups fighting Washington state's LGBT population from receiving the new "everything but marriage" domestic partnership rights, is suing the state to get out of campaign donation limitations.
    A Lynnwood-based organization that opposes the state's domestic partnership law and is working to defeat Referendum 71 has filed suit in U.S. District Court in Tacoma seeking to circumvent campaign contribution limits of $5,000 and to keep secret the names of those who make smaller donations.

    State campaign finance laws require campaigns to disclose names and addresses of those who donate over $25 to a campaign. Campaigns must also include employer names and addresses as well as the occupations of donors contributing over $100. The laws limit to $5,000 contributions from businesses and individuals made within 21 days of the general election.

    The attorney for the Family Policy Institute of Washington, which filed the lawsuit through its newly formed Family PAC late Wednesday, acknowledged that there are substantial contributions in the offing that the campaign wants to accept but can't because of the limits.
    So just like many other anti-LGBT groups suing states because they don't like their laws (see here, here and here), the newly formed Family PAC wants a temporary restraining order to lift the $5,000 limit because they think they're worthy of it.

    Another lawsuit surrounding Referendum 71 comes from the Reject 71 campaign itself. They have appealed all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court because they don't want to disclose the signatures that got the referendum on the ballot.

    These groups who are trying to strip the LGBT population of existing rights claim victims of discrimination and fear boycotts and backlash. Something we have experienced for hundreds of years. And then they cry foul?

    Hypocrisy.

    Or, as Mike Tidmus says, "These sniveling cowards seem to think they’re entitled to special protections and special rights. Don’t they get that we live in a democracy and every statement we make, every position we take, every dollar we donate and every vote we cast has consequences...?

    "Those of us who opposed Prop 8 took our knocks. We saw an increase in hate crimes directed against the LGBT community, we saw bashings, and we saw the leadership of the Yes on 8 campaign attempt to extort money from No on 8 donors whose names they found on public donor rolls."

    Amen, Mike.


    Opposition Robocall


    This is the most recent robo call going out to Washington resident. See their ridiculous TV ads.




    Karen Ocamb's Amazing Article, "URGENT! Gays could lose Domestic Partnerships in Washington state Nov 3."


    Reporter Karen Ocamb at LGBT POV has done an amazing job of painting the bigger, national picture and the importance that Referendum 71 plays.

    Here's an excerpt:
    While the eyes of the LGBT nation are now focused on President Obama signing the federal hate crimes bill and on beating back the Religious Right Prop 8 sequel in Maine – same sex couples in Washington state are sweating bullets that in just over a week they might lose the simplest of family relationship protections – Domestic Partnerships.

    At a Hollywood fundraiser for Maine Tuesday night thrown by Oscar-winning producer Bruce Cohen and political consultant Chad Griffin – the team behind the Ted Olson-David Boies federal challenge to Prop 8 – Cohen said the two challenges are important part of the national movement towards full equal rights:

    “When [the federal challenge to Prop 8] makes it up to the highest court that it ends at – how many states have marriage is going to be a huge part of that victory. So it very much impacts all of us in the state of California and everyone concerned with Prop 8 what happens in Washington state [where an initiative to keep Domestic Partnerships is on the ballot] and in Maine on Nov 3 – and in the District of Columbia where we could have marriage recognized from all over the world – and in New York state where marriage may pass in the next couple of weeks.”


    But it’s an off-year election and Washington is a largely vote-by-mail state where a lot of people might not understand that Approve Referendum 71 means a vote to keep a law already passed by the legislature . . .
    Read the full article at LGBT POV.


    Starbucks Endorses Approve Referendum 71 Campaign


    SLOG blogger Dominic Holden broke the news:
    Seattle-based caffeine cartel Starbucks gave its blessing this week to approve Referendum 71, thereby recognizing that gay couples deserve the same morning coffee rights as their groggy, heterosexual counterparts. In a statement, the company said that approving R-71 "ensures that basic benefits and important protections are not taken away from committed couples, so they are able to take care of each other, especially in times of crisis." Starbucks wants voters to approve the measure "because it is aligned with our business practices, providing domestic partner benefits, and one of our core values of treating people with respect and dignity.”
    Though Starbucks has not donated to the campaign, an anonymous spokeswoman told Dominic that they told all their 3,000 Seattle employees at their headquarters and more at the 667 statewide stores. With Seattle being the most supportive of LGBT rights, this is a big boon.

    "That is just as valuable as when an organization communicates its endorsement to members," Approve R-71 campaign manager Josh Friedes told Dominic. "We are just delighted to have their endorsement along with Microsoft, Boeing, Nike, and many other companies that employ large numbers of people in the Pacific Northwest."


    Brand New Visibility Video - SPREAD IT!




    Get involved with the APPROVE REFERENDUM 71 campaign! Volunteer! Donate! Spread the word!

    Thursday, October 22, 2009

    Homophobia Rampant in Latest E-mail From the Reject 71 Campaign

    Originally posted by Joe Mirabella on Seattle PI.

    I rarely use the word homophobic. I like to save it for those times when there is not a better adjective. In Protect Marriage Washington's case, homophobic is the best adjective to describe their latest e-mail to supporters urging them to reject referendum 71. The letter was written by Senator Val Stevens. She wrote:
    Could this be the final battle?


    Are the homosexuals finally going to take control of our culture and push their depraved lifestyle on our children and families?
    Senator Stevens clearly does not understand the bill. We are simply trying to protect our families and children in times of crisis, like having the ability to take unpaid leave from work to care for a loved one without being fired. I'm not quite sure how that affects her family. Fortunately for us, she elaborated:
    Passed last spring in the legislature, SB5688 would strip away the protections of traditional marriage that were ensured with the passage of DOMA (Defense of Marriage Act) just a few short years ago.
    Senator Stevens probably did not have a chance to read the bill. If she did, she would be happy to know SB5688 does not take anything away from anyone. It simply makes the existing law fair so that all families are treated equally under the law. She will not lose anything. I wonder what other fear tactics she had up her sleeve?
    Do you realize what is going on here? Consider the following:


    In 1970, (on the heels of a "free love" 60's radical culture) sodomy laws were repealed in Washington State, with government turning a blind eye to a behavior commonly considered perversion - and still the case with a majority of Americans.
    First of all, the domestic partnership bill has nothing to do with 1960s style "free love". But since she brought it up, did you know that Sodomy was legally defined as any sexual activity that was not designed to create children. That means Protect Marriage Washington and Senator Stevens are trying to make nearly every Washington adult (gay or straight) feel ashamed.

    As a reminder, if you approve referendum 71 and the domestic partnership bill, families will be able to share health insurance. Referendum 71 is not a time machine that will take us back to the 1960s.

    If you thought that was crazy, just wait. It gets better...

    Senator Stevens thinks about pedophilia:
    Organizations, such as NAMBLA, (North American Man Boy Love Association) appeared on the horizon seeking to repeal "age of consent" laws (NAMBLA is still in business today)
    Wow! Fortunately the domestic partnership bill is not about any of that. If you approve referendum 71 you will protect children by giving them a more secure home. For example, if a police officer is killed trying to save your life, his or her children will have access to death benefits vital to those families in their time of crisis.

    Gladly, no reasonable person condones pedophilia. Clearly though, Senator Stevens spends a lot of time thinking about it. What else is Senator Stevens thinking about?
    After 27 years of relentless pursuit, homosexuals finally received protected class status from the Washington State Legislature in 2006, making it illegal for you to refuse to rent them a house, or hire them on account of their homosexuality.
    That's right. Senator Stevens and Protect Marriage Washington not only want to hurt Washington families seeking basic protections in times of crisis, they would like them to be homeless and jobless too. Fortunately, referendum 71 has nothing to do with either of those issues. Referendum 71 does allow seniors, 62 or older to care for each other without losing their social security income. But please, Senator Stevens, do go on. I'm not scared enough yet.
    Canada already has laws making it illegal to speak against homosexuality on the streets. Bills exist presently in the U.S. Congress to do the same. In the last few weeks a Canadian church pastor was arrested for speaking against homosexuality.
    Let me remind Senator Stevens that Canada is not the United States. In the United States we have something called the First Amendment. Since she has a little problem with law (and the truth), allow me to remind her the First Amendment protects free speech -- even the most homophobic, false, and ugly speech, like the speech of Senator Stevens and Protect Marriage Washington. Just so there is no doubt, approving referendum 71 will not effect free speech. If you approve referendum 71 you will allow a teacher who works 20 years teaching about the Constitution to share his or her hard earned pension with his or her loved one.

    Washington residents are smarter than Senator Stevens and Protect Marriage Washington think. We can see through lies and homophobic speech. I hope we deliver a resounding answer to these fear tactics and absurdities by approving referendum 71 to keep the domestic partnership law. Vote early, ballots are due no later than November 3.

    UTF: If you want to read Sen. Val Stevens full message, it can be found on the Reject Referendum 71 campaign website. Go there at your own risk.

    Wednesday, October 21, 2009

    New 'Approve Referendum 71' Ad - Help Keep It on the Air!



    From Approve 71 campaign manager Josh Friedes:
    Our second ad features Charlene Strong and reminds us of how vulnerable gay and lesbian families were before the legislature established the domestic partnership registry in 2007.

    Voter outreach is even more urgent now that voters have received their ballots -- we need to remind them to vote and to vote APPROVE on Referendum 71.

    Even a small contribution can make a big difference. A contribution of $24 buys one spot on cable news in Spokane. A $250 donation puts Approve Referendum 71's ad on primetime cable news. Donate $500 and the campaign can buy a spot on The Daily Show. Won't you consider donating enough for one ad?

    We have hard-working volunteers calling voters every night. Our first ad has been on the air about a week, and now this latest ad.

    But the race is close: 45% of voters are sure they'll vote "approve," 42% are sure they'll vote "reject," and 13% aren't sure.

    Equality-friendly younger voters are a special challenge. We know they are less likely to vote in off-year elections. We also know that they move more often than older voters, and sometimes have to make a special effort just to get their ballots. Please help us increase our outreach with a donation to the Approve Referendum 71 campaign.

    We need the resources to keep our ads on the air so people know how important it is to defend protections for gay and lesbian couples.

    I spoke to one such couple, Karen Kerr and Penny Stone, who are volunteering for the campaign phone bank. The two firefighters told me how important Referendum 71's passage is for them.

    "People don't know what it's like, to have to hire lawyers to make sure your family has basic protections and lawyers can't provide many of the protections we'll lose if we don't win this referendum fight," Karen said.

    We're confident that if fair-minded voters understand the importance of Referendum 71, they will make sure to get those ballots out of the mail pile, mark approve, and send them in. Help us spread the word. Donate $71, $100, or $250 today!

    Sincerely,

    Josh Friedes
    Campaign Manager
    www.Approve71.org

    PS: If you can't donate, please sign up to volunteer by clicking here!

    And if you haven't already voted, please remember to vote TODAY!
    Lurleen at Pam's House Blend was able to breakdown what airtime your donations can buy.

    $24 - one spot on cable news Spokane
    $71 - one spot on cable news
    $250 - one spot on cable news prime-time
    $500 - Daily Show, Colbert Report, Face the Nation or early morning news broadcast
    $1000- Wheel of Fortune, Jeopardy, Evening News broadcast
    $2500 - Top Chef, Project Runway, Jay Leno, 20/20, 60 min
    $5000 - CSI Miami, 2.5 Men, 30 Rock, Extreme Home Makeover

    Remember to vote APPROVE on Referendum 71!

    Monday, October 19, 2009

    Reject Referendum 71 Supporters Appealing Signature Release Order to U.S. Supreme Court

    UPDATE: Turns out Randall was right. Justice Kennedy has intervened, putting a hold on the federal ruling until he reviews the request to hear the case.

    Gary Randall, leader of the Faith & Freedom Network who is also a leader in the Protect Marriage Washington/Reject Referendum 71 campaign (see their ridiculous ad), has announced that they plan to appeal the 9th Circuit Court's ruling that they release the petition signatures that were responsible for getting the anti-LGBT initiative on Washington state's ballot. If Washingtonians reject Referendum 71, they will strip gays and lesbians of their new domestic partnership rights.

    The Olympian reports that Randall wrote:
    I received an email from attorney James Bopp, Jr. this afternoon, filling us in on some further developments on R-71.

    He said the three-member panel was very liberal leaning and sometimes hostile toward our positions. Not a big surprise.

    Attorney Bopp is taking the matter to the Supreme Court and has contacted Justice Kennedy. As I am typing this update, I just received an email telling us that Justice Kennedy has called for a response to the application to vacate the stay. The response is due Monday, October 19. This is very positive. The vast majority of times the application is denied without requiring a response.

    I cannot give more detail, but we all want you to know we are doing everything humanly possible to protect your rights and freedoms to participate in the election process with out the fear of retribution.

    There is another action item in play this weekend that I cannot discuss publicly at the moment, however, it will play out over the next couple of days.
    This is yet another obstacle facing Secretary of State Sam Reed's office, who planned to release the signatures claiming its a matter of public record, but they also face another suit filed by a petition supporter.

    LGBT-rights opponents fear harassment if the names are released. Tom Lang, director of knowthyneighbor.org, working in conjunction with Washington activists of whosigned.org, plans to post the names on his site.

    Get involved. Go to Approve71.org!

    Friday, October 16, 2009

    Judge Rules Referendum 71 Petition Signatures to Be Released; POC Organizations Endorse 'Approve' Campaign

    A three-member panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in California reversed a lower court's ruling Thursday and ordered the petition signatures that enabled anti-LGBT Referendum 71 to go on Washington state's November ballot to be released.

    The conservative group Protect Marriage Washington plans to appeal. Their attorney Stephen Pidgeon said, "That particular group of judges saw the law one way; we'll take it to the next group of judges that may have the opportunity to see it the correct way."

    Seattle Times reports:
    In its brief order, the appeals panel said Settle used a wrong legal standard in granting a preliminary injunction that barred release of the petitions, and that the injunction therefore must be reversed. The judges said they would issue an opinion later explaining their reasoning.

    Protect Marriage Washington had argued that petition signatures are protected free speech under the First Amendment, and as such should be shielded from public release. The group said it wanted to keep the petitions out of public view because it feared harassment from gay-rights supporters.

    ------

    Washington's Attorney General's Office, which represented the secretary of state before the Circuit Court panel, argued that voters had approved the Public Records Act and that signature gathering is a very public process — unlike the private act of voting.
    In more good news, 31 organizations representing communities of color have endorsed the Approve Referendum 71 campaign.
    “There isn’t just one type of family in our communities. We are a diverse community, with diverse families. They all deserve legal protections and to be treated fairly under the law especially during these times of economic uncertainty,” said Estela Ortega, Executive Director of El Centro de la Raza.

    The organizations support the Approve Referendum 71 campaign because gay and lesbian couples need domestic partnership laws to provide essential protections for their families. Committed couples who want to take care of each other should be allowed to visit each other in the hospital, take family and medical leave when a loved one is seriously ill, and have insurance coverage. Families with children need the protections provided by domestic partnership laws, especially when a parent dies. There are gay and lesbian couples in our community whose relationships are not recognized by their employers, leaving them uninsured or ineligible to receive survivor’s benefits if one of them passes away.
    Read this excellent post by Lurleen at Pam's House Blend on how to get fully engaged in the Approve Referendum 71 campaign. Also, go to Approve71.org and find out even more ways to protect Washington's expanded domestic partnership law.

    White House Issues Statement on Maine/Washington Referenda . . . Sort Of

    The amazing Kerry Eleveld, the Advocate's White House correspondent, asked the White House for a statement on the discriminatory referenda taking place in Washington state and Maine.

    She got a response.
    “The President has long opposed divisive and discriminatory efforts to deny rights and benefits to same-sex couples, and as he said at the Human Rights Campaign dinner, he believes ‘strongly in stopping laws designed to take rights away.’ Also at the dinner, he said he supports, ‘ensuring that committed gay couples have the same rights and responsibilities afforded to any married couple in this country.’"
    UTF readers already know that, though I applauded President Obama for speaking at the HRC fundraiser and reiterating his support for LGBT rights, I was critical of the fact that it was just a repeat of his campaign promises.

    This new statement reflects the same tactics and doesn't mention Washington or Maine directly. Obama's been clear that he supports civil unions and not particularly marriage equality, so direct reference would be rather difficult for him to pull off without ramifications to him. Though of course I would love it if he had.

    Yet, this statement does provide a lot of fodder for the Approve Referendum 71 and NO on 1/Protect Maine Equality campaigns to use in their media, direct mail and phone banking.

    So though I hope more from President Obama, I am grateful for this statement.

    Monday, October 12, 2009

    View First Approve Referendum 71 Ad; Opposition Forms PAC for Big Donations

    The Approve 71 campaign has released its first campaign ad that strikes a great tone, and not only shows how approving the new "everything but marriage" domestic partnership law will help LGBT couples but also senior citizens who benefit as well.



    Here is the radio ad:



    The opposition that is the Reject 71 campaign, who have the most hard-hitting, weirdest religious based ads ever, has just filed a PAC, reports Dominic Holden at SLOG.
    Filing a new PAC is a "giant red flag" that anti-gay forces are about to dump loads of cash into the anti-gay Reject R-71 campaign, says WAFST campaign manager Josh Friedes. Much of the money for California's anti-gay Prop 8 came in the final weeks before the election.

    "The filing of a PAC a few days before the cutoff suggests that this is a strategy to significantly fund an anti-gay campaign but have it cloaked in secrecy until such a time that that it is difficult to respond because of the state’s campaign finance laws," says Friedes.

    "We won't know until how much money is dumped in until after the cut-off, so it will be hard to make it up in smaller contributions," Friedes says. "Anybody who can donate over $5,000 should do so now."
    Donate to the Approve 71 campaign!

    Read about yesterday's march in Washington state that brought out 1,500 for LGBT rights.

    Thursday, October 8, 2009

    My Response to the New Anti-LGBT Reject Ref. 71 Ad: AAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

    Unfortunately, this is no joke.



    Don't believe this is real and not a spoof? Go here, if you dare.

    What's interesting is that a commenter on Pam's House Blend pointed out that the picture of Adam & Farrah Fawcett, oh sorry, I mean Eve, is intellectual property of the Mormon church. Hmm . . . so either this ad will be pulled because the LDS church will be unhappy with its use (but somehow I doubt this), or the church was behind the ad in some capacity.

    Well, I'm just shocked. SHOCKED!

    Sadly, these loons, who believe that people during the times of Genesis rode dinosaurs to work a la the Flintstones, are doing an effective job in getting people to reject the new "everything but marriage" domestic partnership law. (That's right - it has nothing to do with marriage.) The polls show a dead heat.

    Unfortunately, they have others ads that don't evoke a snicker out of me. Though they're full of lies, that doesn't seem to matter to voters - they're very effective and most people watching won't take the time to verify the claims these ads make.



    Lurleen at Pam's House Blend does a great job of breaking down this ad and pointing out lie after lie after lie after lie . . .

    I can't believe that such blatant misinformation is legal and that they can get away with this. But unfortunately, they can. And it will cost us.

    We have to counter these ads. We have to get our support out to the polls on election day.

    Get involved. Go to Approve71.org to donate and volunteer.

    Wednesday, October 7, 2009

    Referendum 71 Holds Narrow Lead in Polls, Needs Strong Voter Turn Out

    Survey USA conducted a poll which shows Referendum 71 holding a narrow lead, reflecting similar results from an earlier poll. Approving the Washington state referendum is a vote to approve the "everything but marriage" domestic partnership law.

    The numbers show 45% approve, 42% reject and 13% undecided.
    Among men, the measure is rejected by a 4-point margin; among women, it is approved by 12 points -- a 16-point gender gap. 72% of Republicans say they will vote to reject; 72% of Democrats say they will vote to approve; independents reject by a 13-point margin. In Metro Seattle, the measure is approved by 18 points; in Eastern Washington, it is rejected by 18 points. Western Washington voters outside of Metro Seattle are more divided, with an 8-point margin voting against the referendum.
    With Seattle making up 53% of the state's electorate, a strong GOTV campaign is needed to be sure LGBT allies come out and vote on the measure.

    To help the Approve 71 campaign get out the vote, go to Approve71.org and get involved!

    Tuesday, October 6, 2009

    Referendum 71 News: Equal Rights Washington Airs Educational Ad; Microsoft Donates $100K to 'Approve' Campaign

    Equal Rights Washington Airs Educational Ad

    With the fate of Washington state's new "everything but marriage" domestic partnership law in the hands of voters this November, Equal Rights Washington has released an educational ad featuring Charlene Strong, who tragically lost her wife in a 2006 flooding incident in Seattle.



    The ad is airing "through the end of the week in Seattle, Walla Walla, Yakima, Tri Cities, Vancouver, and Bellingham" says the SLOG.

    You can donate to help buy more airtime for the ad.

    Vote to APPROVE REFERENDUM 71 to keep the domestic partnership law.


    Microsoft Donate $100K to Approve Referendum 71 Campaign

    The SLOG reports
    :
    Asserting itself as a powerful advocate for gay rights, the Microsoft Corporation donated $100,000 to the campaign trying to approve Referendum 71, a report filed today with the state Public Disclosure Commission shows (.pdf).

    ------

    This took guts. Microsoft's brazen role in R-71 will outrage the Ken Hutchersons of the world, who pressured Microsoft for years to back off from supporting gay-rights legislation.
    Microsoft's contribution surpasses all the donations combined for the opposition's campaign which continues to deceive voters into thinking this a marriage issue when it's not.

    Hopefully Microsoft's generosity will help the Approve campaign continue to get their message out loud and clear.

    Get involved. Go to Approve71.org.

    Tuesday, September 29, 2009

    Seattle City Council Passes Approve Referendum 71 Resolution

    On Monday Seattle's City Council passed a resolution urging the residents to vote to Approve Referendum 71, which would keep the new expanded domestic partnership law which extends all of Washington state's rights and benefits of marriage to same-sex couples except the title.

    The resolution states:
    RESOLUTION 31154

    A RESOLUTION urging Seattle voters to vote "approved" on Washington State Referendum 71 thereby retaining Engrossed Second Substitute Senate Bill 5688 which would expand the rights and responsibilities of state registered domestic partners to equal those of married spouses.

    WHEREAS, on May 18th Governor Christine Gregoire signed Engrossed Second Substitute Senate Bill 5688 into law providing that, for all purposes under state law, state registered domestic partners shall be treated the same as spouses; and

    WHEREAS, opponents of Engrossed Second Substitute Senate Bill 5688 filed Referendum 71 to send Engrossed Second Substitute Senate Bill 5688 to a vote of the citizens of Washington; and

    WHEREAS, enough signatures have been gathered and the citizens of Washington will vote on Referendum 71 in Washington State's November 2009 general election; and

    WHEREAS, a vote of "approved" on Referendum 71 will allow Engrossed Second Substitute Senate Bill 5688 to become law and provide that state registered domestic partners be treated the same as spouses under state law; and

    WHEREAS, a vote of "rejected" on Referendum 71 would repeal Engrossed Second Substitute Senate Bill 5688 and allow state registered domestic partners to be treated differently than spouses under state law; and

    WHEREAS, the City of Seattle embraces legal equality and fair treatment for all residents, and values the contributions and personal dignity of all; and

    WHEREAS, the City of Seattle has legally protected its citizens from discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation since 1973, and on the basis of gender identity since 1999; and

    WHEREAS, since 1993, the City of Seattle has provided its employees with health benefit coverage for city registered domestic partners; and

    WHEREAS, since 1999, unmarried members of the City of Seattle Retirement City Employees' Retirement System can designate a domestic partner as his or her beneficiary; and

    WHEREAS, since 2000, the City of Seattle has required contractors on City contracts to provide employee benefits to their employees with domestic partners equivalent to those provided to their employees with spouses;

    NOW, THEREFORE,

    BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEATTLE, THE MAYOR CONCURRING, THAT:

    Section 1. The City of Seattle urges Seattle voters to vote "approved" on Referendum 71 on the November, 2009 ballot, thereby retaining Engrossed Second Substitute Senate Bill 5688 and expanding the rights and responsibilities of state registered domestic partners as equal to those of spouses.
    Get involved with helping Referendum 71 pass by going to the Approve 71 campaign website!

    Read a great post by Lurleen at Pam's House Blend, "A Day in the Life of the Approve Referendum 71 Campaign."