Showing posts with label Nevada. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Nevada. Show all posts

Monday, June 1, 2009

Nevada Has Domestic Partnerships Thanks to Legislature Veto Override

On Sunday night, the Nevada Assembly voted 28-14 with a bare minimum to override Gov. Jim Gibbons veto of the bill granting legal rights to domestic partnerships. This came shortly after the Senate, which voted 14-7.

The law takes effect on October 1. This will make Nevada the 17th state to recognize gay and lesbian relationships. The law will also recognize opposite sex couples wanting a domestic partnership.

Supporters, such as Assemblywoman Sheila Leslie, who gave the only speech on the floor, called this a “historic vote for equality and justice.”



“This is the most important civil rights legislation we’ve had in all my years here and I am so happy and honored to be a part of it.” She said she knew it was “a struggle” for many legislators.

She said domestic partners “are not asking us to approve of their lives or how they live but they are asking us for respect. As citizens of this great state, they are asking that their government give them the ability to choose who they will live with and who they will love.”

Gary Peck, executive director of the ACLU in Nevada, said “this is a proud day in Nevada’s history. With its override, our Legislature has put our state on the right side of a growing movement to honor this country’s promise that every one of us is entitled to equal treatment under the law.”

In Nevada, domestic partners will have the rights granting community property responsibility for debt to third parties and the right to request financial assistance after a split. The bill says domestic partners have the same rights, protections and benefits that are ranged or imposed upon spouses.

The bill is very specific in stating that these relationships are not a marriage, which the Nevada constitution defines as can only be between a man and a woman through an amendment passed in 2002.

The governor, in his veto message, said the voters in 2002 felt “the right of marriage should apply only to married couples, only the voters should determine whether those rights should equally apply to domestic partners.”

Sen. David Parks, the openly gay sponsor of SB283, said it's "about fairness and equality," and that it doesn't diminish the sanctity of marriage.

Voting against the bill on Sunday were Republicans John Carpenter of Elko, Chad Christensen of Las Vegas, Tyrus Cobb of Reno, Heidi Gansert of Reno, Pete Goicoechea of Eureka, Tom Grady of Yerington, Don Gustavson of Sparks, John Hambrick of Las Vegas, Joe Hardy of Boulder City, Richard McArthur of Las Vegas, James Settelmeyer of Gardnerville, Lynn Stewart and Melissa Woodbury, both of Henderson.

One Democrat, Mo Denis of Las Vegas, voted to sustain the governor’s veto. Edwin Goedhart, a Republican from Amargosa Valley voted for the override.

ACTION: Contact the supporters and show them your gratitude for their support of LGBT relationships!

Senate Contact information.

Assembly Contact information.

Tuesday, May 26, 2009

Nevada Governor Vetoes Domestic Partners Bill

Twice divorced Nevada Gov. Jim Gibbons has vetoed his legislature's domestic partners bill, that would give domestic partners, whether gay or straight, many of the rights and benefits that Nevada offers to married couples.

For reasoning behind his veto, the governor stated the bill conflicts with the state's 2002 constitutional amendment that only relationships between men and women would be recognized.

Gibbons says that gay couples should resort to legal contracts between themselves if they want to protect their assets and ensure medical decision-making rights. It's unknown if the legislature will attempt to override Gibbons' veto.

So, no surprise here. His solution is for LGBT people to pay thousands of extra dollars in legal fees to protect themselves and their families, on top of paying thousands of extra dollars in taxes due to being forced to file separately.

Must be nice to have a discriminatory amendment to back up your discriminatory views, protecting you from taking on any real responsibility for your decisions.

Friday, May 22, 2009

Nevada Governor Pledges to Veto Domestic Partnership Bill (TAKE ACTION)

Nevada Gov. Jim Gibbons (R) has promised to veto the domestic partnership bill. His spokesperson Daniel Burns has said that:

"The governor believes that government has no business in your medicine chest or your bedroom"

He also believes there are existing contracts that can be created, so no change to the law is needed. If there are people who want to be domestic partners, they can do so under existing laws.

He is also mindful of the fact that voters of this state on two occasions have said that marriage is between a man and a woman, and it's part of our Constitution."

It is unfair to deny domestic partners equal rights, and create legal obstacles for partners to obtain the same rights when it comes to estate planning, family planning, and medical decision making.

To contact Governor Jim Gibbons:

State Capitol
101 N. Carson Street
Carson City, NV 89701
(775) 684-5670
Fax: (775) 684-5683

E-contact form

The good news is that there is word there may be enough votes within the state senate to override the Governor's veto. It is imperative Nevada residents contact their senators to urge for passage of senate bill 283.

Crossposted with Queers United.

Wednesday, April 15, 2009

Nevada Gov. Threatens Veto of Domestic Partnership Bill

Nevada's Republican Governor Jim Gibbons has made his position on domestic partnerships very clear, telling the Las Vegas Review-Journal, "I just don't believe it."

The bill would give same-sex couples “same rights, protections, benefits, responsibilities, obligations and duties” as married couples in the state. The governor remarked the domestic partnerships is just another way of saying marriage and referred to what happened in California as grounds for his decision.

Contact the governor and urge him to support the bill.

State Capitol
101 N. Carson Street
Carson City, NV 89701
(775) 684-5670
Email

Openly gay Nevada Sen. David Parks wrote the bill. He told the Review-Journal, “I see the bill as only being on first base. It has a long way to go before getting to the governor.”

Voice your support for the senator.

Capitol Address
Care of Nevada Senate
401 South Carson Street, Room 2121
Carson City, NV 89701
Phone: 775-684-6504

District Address
Post Office Box 71887
Las Vegas, NV 89170-1887
Phone: 702-736-6929 (Home)
dparks@sen.state.nv.us

Monday, March 30, 2009

Tempers flare and emotions show during Nevada gay rights bill debates

From Lez Get Real:

"Carson City, Nevada- Debate was intense, tempers flared and emotions ran high during committee hearings in the Nevada Senate and State Assembly on Friday as several bills dealing with same-sex domestic partnerships and discrimination based on sexual orientation and “gender identity or expression” were discussed.

"Last week, Sen. David Parks, D-Las Vegas, introduced two of these bills into committee… Senate Bill 283, which calls for a new type of civil contract for domestic partnerships, in which domestic partners would have the same rights, protections and benefits as a married couple in Nevada and Senate Bill 207, which is designed to give protection from discrimination based on sexual orientation in public accommodations. Both came under fire from opponents.

"Richard Ziser, a former Republican nominee for the US Senate and a Nevada Concerned
Citizen lobbyist, expressed strong opposition to Senate Bill 283, pointing out that 6 years ago the Nevada State Constitution was amended to define marriage to be between one man and one woman and contended the bill was a move to circumvent that amendment.

"But in emotional testimony, Pamela Brooks of Reno, tearfully told the committee how she had been denied access to the body of her long-time partner after she passed away in a hospital, saying she was treated like a criminal and told to leave the hospital room.

“Since I was not next of kin, I had no rights to my deceased partner, could not have her final effects like her commitment ring, wallet or even an article of clothing to take away, I never saw her body again, and that was the last of our relationship,' Brooks told senators, adding that she 'doesn’t want special rights, only equal rights.'”


Read the rest of the article from Lez Get Real that contains information about the heated debate and personal offenses on Bill SB207, which would bar discrimination in public areas based on one's sexual orientation.